Re: [PATCH] IPVS sync endianess fixed

[Justin Ossevoort <justin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Joerg Rieger wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 08:07:35AM -0400, Joseph Mack wrote:
>  
>
> > Roberto Nibali wrote:
> >    
> >
> > > You're the first one I know to mix big with little endian within LVS' realm.
> > >      
> > RedHat had an alpha and a 386 machine doing failover years ago, but that was 
> > before
> > the server state sync demon.
> >    
> So running a mixed active-active LVS director setup composed of a ia32
> and an UltraSparc will work fine?
>  
Well we're running a simple test setup here to test 2.6 kernels and 
different software for ipvs. With a basic setup it runs fine with one 
server being an UltraSparc IIe and the other a Intel Xeon based system.
The only part I haven't checked (because in our current setup it's not 
used) is the part where 'struct ip_vs_sync_conn_options' is added to the 
message. But looking at the way the code is set up that should probably 
work fine.
Regards,

   justin....