LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Weighted Round Robin: Maximum Weight

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Weighted Round Robin: Maximum Weight
From: Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:52:20 +0000
And with ldirectord you'd use the fallback server.


Regards,

Malcolm Turnbull.

Loadbalancer.org Limited



Fredrik Månsson wrote:

Keepalived is supporting sorry server configuration. Maybe you should take a 
look at that.
"sorry_server, server to be added to the pool if all real servers are down"

Regards Fredrik.

-----Original Message----- From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Mohd Irwan b. Jamaluddin Sent: Mon 2004-11-29 11:15 To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Subject: Weighted Round Robin: Maximum Weight
        
        

Good day, I am planning to use weighted round robin (wrr) as the scheduler. There are 2 RealServers (A & B) but the management would like to use machine A as the primary server. In normal situation, all the request from client should go to machine A. It seems that machine B is idle and only works when Machine A is down. Hence, I should give the machine A more weight. May I know what is the maximum number to set the weight? Is it possible to put 1000 as the weight? Thank you :)

-- Regards, Mohd Irwan b. Jamaluddin System Engineer, Magnifix Sdn. Bhd. [http://www.magnifix.com/] Tel: 603-4270 5073 (Office) Tel: 6019-2161 793 (Mobile) _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>