LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: real server failover

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: real server failover
From: "Christen R. Pacheco" <cpacheco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:40:03 -0500
Keepalive provides a wide array of services such as multi interface
VRRP, easy LVS configuration and healthcheckers for removing sites from
LVS when they fail.  I have never utilized the linux-ha project but it
seems interesting and I might give it a run here one of these days... 

Keepalived also has a large install base (more users using it in
production) than linux-ha and has been released for a longer period of
time in production... (ie more people report bugs etc...)

-----Original Message-----
From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joerg
Rieger
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 3:19 PM
To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: real server failover

On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 03:09:00PM -0500, Christen R. Pacheco wrote:
> I know if you utilize the keeplived app provided by Andre Cassen
> keepalived.org you can a sorry server statement... so I suppose that
> there must be some setting inside LVS.

Isn't for that purpose heartbeat a more suitable solution than LVS?

http://www.linux-ha.org/

-- 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>