|
kwijibo@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> DR will scale the best. In a NAT configuration all the return traffic
> from the nodes has to pass back through the LVS. In a DR configuration the
> nodes themselves respond to the client. There is nothing to solve in
> the NAT configuration because nothing is broken. NAT by it's very nature
> just doesn't scale well.
With 2.4 kernels the LVS-NAT code was rewritten and the scaling is a lot better.
I don't have any numbers for the difference. Still unless you have a good
reason,
you pick LVS-DR first.
Joe
--
Joseph Mack PhD, High Performance Computing & Scientific Visualization
LMIT, Supporting the EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 919-541-0007
Federal Contact - John B. Smith 919-541-1087 - smith.johnb@xxxxxxx
|
