|
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jim Miller
> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 11:52 AM
> To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
> Subject: ip_vs_user_sync_simple-1.0.2 and kernel 2.4.28
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Sorry to be mister pesty but I have a few questions. I'm trying to use
> Horms' ip_vs_user_sync_simple-1.0.2 and linux-2.4.26-user_sync.3.patch. I
> read that ipvs 1.0.12 is in the 2.4.28 kernel. Do I still need the
> ip_vs_user_sync patch with ipvs 1.0.12 in 2.4.28? Or should I just stick
> with 2.4.26 and ipvs 1.0.10?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Jim
>
>
> _______________________________________________
I think I answered my own question and hopefully I'm understanding it
correctly ;)
I was just re-reading Chapter 28 of the LVS-HOWTO.. specifically 28.5 where
Horms says, "In 2.6 the code has been enhanced by Julian to allow a
peer-to-peer setup. The current 2.6 code allows you to run a master or a
backup sync daemon. If you want p2p then you just run both - previously you
could only run one or the other. This is configured through ipvsadm."
So I'm going to compile 2.6.11-7 w/hidden-2.6.9 arp patch (and all the IPVS
support of course) and once I get saru to compile ;) I'll just run the
following on both directors:
ipvsadm --start-daemon=master -mcast-interface=ethx
ipvsadm --start-daemon=backup -mcast-interface=ethx
Thanks,
Jim
|
