|
On Mon, 9 May 2005, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 9 May 2005, Mark de Vries wrote:
>
> > > You can try the attached patch. It removes one extra
> > > __ip_vs_conn_put from ip_vs_icmp_xmit. If it fixes the problem, it
> > > means you receive lots of incoming ICMPs from clients. May be
> > > FRAG_NEEDED messages?
> >
> > But anyway; I applied your patch to 2.6.11.8 and so far it looks
> > promesing! Although the trend is still a rising ip_vs_conn slab usage I
> > can sometimes see it go down. (Usage is still rising this time of day so
> > that upward trend seems normal.) Also I no longer see the 'delayed'
> > messages when settting the debuglevel to 8. So, looks like entries are
> > beeing expired! :). I'll keep a close watch and let you know how it
> > behaves @ and after peak hours.
>
> Very good. Let me know if it keeps up for more days and i'll post
> the patch for kernel inclusion.
>
Well it's been running since monday with your patch and it's doing great!
Connections are beeing expired normally and debug output no longer shows
the delayed messages. Everything seems to work fine.
Tnnx,
Mark.
|
