On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 14:01, Volker Dormeyer wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 01:27:52PM +0530,
> Ramprasad A Padmanabhan <ramprasad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 18:37, Graham David Purcocks M.A.(Oxon.) wrote:
> > > You can only use DR if all machines are on the same network. If you are
> > > on different networks, you need NAT and if you want to do port
> > > redirection, and you can tunnel over WANs
> >
> > I have a doubt , when you say "all machines on the same n/w" you mean
> > all the server machines right ? The client can connect to the server
> > pool behind the LVS from anywhere in the internet.
>
> All real server machines and the LVS system itself are meant here. The
> sketch on [1] should make it clear. Yes, the clients can connect from
> anywhere.
>
> 1. http://www.linux-vs.org/VS-DRouting.html
>
In case of an HTTP server most of the data is from the HTTP server
to the client. And so the throughput is high , since the server to
client packets are directly routed from the server and not the LVS
Will there be any drop of throughput if I use LVS for a set of SMTP
servers. Because these SMTP servers are going to recieve mails , and
most of the packets are client to server. These packets have to routed
via the LVS only
Is there anyone already using LVS for SMTP servers
Thanks
Ram
----------------------------------------------------------
Netcore Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
Website: http://www.netcore.co.in
Spamtraps: http://cleanmail.netcore.co.in/directory.html
----------------------------------------------------------
|