LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: AW: lvs active/active

To: jimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: AW: lvs active/active
From: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:39:54 +0900
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 10:46:09AM -0500, Jim Miller wrote:
> > Joseph Mack PhD, High Performance Computing & Scientific Visualisation
> > LMIT, Supporting the EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 919-541-0007 Federal
> > Infrastructure Contact-Ravi Nair 919-541-5467 - nair.ravi@xxxxxxx,
> > Federal Visualization  Contact - Joe Retzer, Ph.D. 919-541-4190 -
> > retzer.joseph@xxxxxxx
> >
> > lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 06/06/2005 11:08:33
> > AM:
> >
> > > On the same VIP is not possible without 3DNS or something
> > > of that nature.
> >
> > don't tell me, tell the computer
> >
> > > How is active/active required for failover?
> >
> > can you not read the link yourself?
> >
> > Joe
> >
> 
> Horms, if you're listening out there -- What it would take to cajole you
> into looking into getting saru to compile with a 2.6 kernel?

This has definately helped.
Most of the saru code is in user-space so
porting the kernel stuff should be easy enough.
Likely a bigger issue is updating saru
for the changes in heartbeat (or stopping using 
as a communications layer).

-- 
Horms

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>