|
Purcocks, Graham a écrit :
Whats the output from
Ipvsadm?
Have you set up the VIP address on the servers?
I have not set the virtual address on the real servers.
I've seen that I must add an alias such as lo:0 with the virtual address
and desactive arp response in for these servers. Is it right? Some
documentation don't talk at all about this!
-----Original Message-----
From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of krimo
Sent: 01 July 2005 15:58
To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Apache: Simple load balancing
Hi,
I want to test the direct routing method to load balance the trafic my
servers deal with. I'm testing LVS without success.
I have a load balancer (10.16.0.77 debian distro) and two apache servers
10.16.0.41 and 10.16.0.42.
I've installed ipvsadm on the load balancer and load modules I need
(kernel 2.6.10):
ip_vs_rr 1856 1
ip_vs_wlc 1888 0 # I know I don't need this one for
direct routing
ip_vs 88288 6 ip_vs_rr,ip_vs_wlc
I configured this rules on the director (my vip is 10.16.0.44):
ipvsadm -A -t 10.16.0.44:80
ipvsadm -a -t 10.16.0.44:80 -r 10.16.0.41 -g
I test with an access to a simple php file: http://10.16.0.44/test.php.
I look in the acces_log file of apache running on my first real server
10.16.0.41 but it's the apache running on the director that serve my
test.php.
I also test with tcpdum (tcpdump -n -i any port 80) but the director
does not forward anything. I hope friendly users of LVS could help me ;)
Regards.
aaits.
| 