|
Hello,
Is it possible to use another director which works better for
that problem?
regards
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]De la part
> de Stéphane
> KLEIN
> Envoyé : mardi 5 juillet 2005 12:14
> À : 'Horms'; lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Objet : RE: Weight problem
>
>
> Thanks for your response,
>
> I tried with the last version of ldirectord, but the result
> is the same.
> I have noticed there was a problem when i tried to add
> request and receive
> tests
> on the same line than the real server IP (real=10.1.1.25:80 masq 1
> "/test.htm" "test").
> So i added that request and receive tests on another line.
>
> Is there a similar problem with the weight parameter?
>
> Regards
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Horms [mailto:horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Envoyé : mardi 5 juillet 2005 11:25
> À : Stéphane Klein; LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
> Objet : Re: Weight problem
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 10:42:07AM +0200, Stéphane KLEIN wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using lvs load balancers for web applications.
> > Kernel version: 2.6.10
> > Cluster Management: Heartbeat 1.2.3
> > Job scheduling algorithm: wlc
> > Cluster's type: LVS/NAT
> > Monitoring daemon: Ldirectord 1.77.2.5
> >
> >
> > I have two web servers with differents processors. I try to
> implement
> > different weight for that servers.
> > So, here is ldirectord configuration file:
> >
> > checktimeout=8
> > checkinterval=5
> > virtual=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:80
> > protocol=tcp
> > scheduler=wlc
> > persistent=900
> > real=10.1.1.25:80 masq 1
> > real=10.1.1.26:80 masq 3
> > checktype=connect
> > service=http
> >
> > The ipvsadm -Ln result is:
> >
> > IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
> > Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
> > -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn
> InActConn
> > TCP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:80 wlc persistent 900
> > -> 10.1.1.26:80 Masq 1 2 30
> > -> 10.1.1.25:80 Masq 1 2 2
> >
> > You can see that the weight is not correct.
> > An idea?
>
> Hi,
>
> 1.77.2.5 is a pretty old version of ldirectord, and there
> have been many
> fixes. The current CVS version, 1.77.2.20 (also known as 1.108), does
> not exhibit this behaviour, you can get it from cvs or cvsweb, as per
> the instructions at http://www.vergenet.net/linux/ldirectord/cvs.shtml
>
> N.B: this version does have a bug in the https (not http) check,
> I hope to have a fix in CVS shortly.
>
> --
> Horms
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
|
