|
Its your system, you do what's best for you.
-----Original Message-----
From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lloyd
Brown
Sent: 21 September 2005 00:28
To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
Subject: Re: ldirectord checktype=connect false positive
I understand. Normally, I'd agree with you, especially since they're
not
AMD processors, but Intel EM64T processors, so they shouldn't have any
real problems with the i386 code. However, I'm just a student they
hired
to help out for a few months with the cluster (I graduate in April), and
so maintainability and consistency are pretty important. The rest of
the
cluster is running everything in x86_64 packages, so I'd like to keep it
as consistant as possible. That, and it's what my boss told me to do.
If I had my choice, I'd re-architect the whole cluster using x86_64
debian, but that's another story...
Thanks again,
Lloyd
Graham David Purcocks M.A.(Oxon.) said:
> I'm using the same RHEL3. Why are you worried about the x86_64
packages
> for an LVS machine? Can't you just use the normal ones. I didn't think
> it was particularly processor intensive.
>
> If you are not doing anything mega complicated and you aren't
balancing
> at full Ethernet speed, is using the x86_64 system necessary?
>
> Completely irrelevant to your specific problem but just a thought.
>
> Looking at the code. I remember connect for UDP isn't supported in my
> version. Looks like this code does. Therefore I'd say you've found a
bug
> introduced by the UDP changes.
>
> Graham
|
