|
Horms wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 02:06:24PM +0200, David Osojnik wrote:
>
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I have a problem with LVS:
>>
>>I have a web server LVS and i have a problem like this:
>>
>>All the REMOTE nodes work GREAT and are distributed nicely!
>>The problem is Local Node! It has FAR Less connections then other nodes!
>>And i would like them to have the same processes each! Local or Remote!
>>
>>
>
>That is quite curiously. Especially the veyr high number of
>inactive connections. Can you verify that connections served by Local
>and Route real servers actually work for the end-user?
>
>
>
Yes they work when i disable all others 2,3,4,5,6 and leave only local i
get a request from local and when i disable 1 i get a reply from others...
>>if i do:
>>
>>"ps aux |grep httpd |wc -l" on all the nodes i get this:
>>
>>IP : httpd processes
>>10.0.0.1: 29
>>10.0.0.2: 508
>>10.0.0.3: 462
>>10.0.0.4: 500
>>10.0.0.5: 471
>>10.0.0.6: 459
>>
>>Here is the output of "ipvsadm -L -n":
>>
>>IP Virtual Server version 1.2.0 (size=4096)
>>Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
>> -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
>>TCP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:80 rr
>> -> 10.0.0.1:80 Local 100 48 3273
>> -> 10.0.0.2:80 Route 100 34559 29
>> -> 10.0.0.3:80 Route 100 34518 42
>> -> 10.0.0.4:80 Route 100 34605 39
>> -> 10.0.0.5:80 Route 100 34627 37
>> -> 10.0.0.6:80 Route 100 34582 36
>>
>>I remember a time back when we had RedHat 9 it worked great but now it
>>is not working good!
>>
>>I tried changing the LVS to other servers so i got Local on other
>>servers but the problem is the same with the Local node! (far less
>>connections)
>>
>>Any ideas? Thank You!
>>
>>I use:
>>- RedHat Enterprise Server 4
>>- ipvsadm v1.24 2003/06/07 (compiled with popt and IPVS v1.2.0)
>>- Keepalived v1.1.11 (04/13,2005)
>>- 2.6.9-11.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri May 20 18:26:27 EDT 2005 i686 i686 i386
>>GNU/Linux
>>- scheduler is rr or wrr or wlc (same problem on all)
>>
>>
>
>
>
|
