On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Jacob Coby wrote:
Which makes me wonder - would there be any advantage to
creating an indirect route (IDR) mode where the realserver
uses the director as its router?
It's available if you want it (the forward_shared patches).
http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.LVS-DR.html#LVS-DR_director_default_gw
you throw away much of the security advantages of LVS-DR
http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.LVS-DR.html#Pearthree
to use it.
Of course, that removes the bandwith advantage that DR
mode has and pretty much makes it NAT without the address
translation.
I haven't seen any numbers, but since LVS was rewritten for
2.4 kernels, Julian assures us that LVS-NAT is just as fast
as LVS-DR.
Joe
--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
|