|
Whoa. You are reading to much into this. People think you mean monitor
'loading' which is what feedbackd does.
LVS *does* monitor the servers and stops sending to that server. I don't
think that was quite what you asked.
-----Original Message-----
From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dan
Trainor
Sent: 05 October 2005 17:59
To: Joseph Mack NA3T; lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Choosing the appropriate scheduling method, general
questions
Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Dan Trainor wrote:
>
>> I think Horms gave me the answer I was looking for, as in "LVS itself
>> does not have this kind of monitoring capability", which kinda bummed
me
>> out.
>
>
> I saw the load balancing part of your question but not the monitoring.
> My bad - sorry.
>
> In LVS monitoring is external
>
> Joe
Joe -
Alright thanks, fair enough.
I'd like a system that would be able to manage which real servers are
actually available, stuff like that.
It's my understanding that not many people use LVS, but rather,
distributions and software based off of LVS. Is my understanding
correct?
Thanks
-dant
|
