LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: lvs + squid + squidguard

To: "'LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: lvs + squid + squidguard
From: "Tony Spencer" <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:47:43 +0100

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lvs-users-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joseph Mack NA3T
> Sent: 13 October 2005 16:34
> To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
> Subject: RE: lvs + squid + squidguard
> 
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Tony Spencer wrote:
> 
> >> why are your LVS-NAT realservers seeing requests to the VIP.
> >> All packets when they get to the LVS-NAT realservers should
> >> have a dst_addr of the RIP.
> >
> > Because the LVS-NAT servers run both squid and http and use the same VIP
> IP
> > address.
> 
> LVS-NAT doesn't have the VIP on the realservers
> 

No the LVS has the VIP.
But if you're at a remote location outside of the LVS/RIP network the Squid
VIP and the VIP for all web content on the Real Servers is the same.

Anyway at least what wasn't working now is apart from my squidguard stuff.

Tony

> Joe
> 
> --
> Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
> jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
> generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
> Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> 
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.14/131 - Release Date:
> 12/10/2005
> 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.14/131 - Release Date: 12/10/2005
 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>