|
Dear Graham,
Thank you very much for your help.
The real server is already using LVS as a gateway. I read all Red Hat
documentation throughly but it does not mention about howto build the
proxy cluster with LVS. I just need the example to follow.
As my investigation, current LVS is not fowarding the packet from
Virtual IP to the real server. I will very gratefully if you can tell
me the way to resolve this problem.
Bunpot T.
On 11/2/05, Purcocks, Graham <grahamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You do have the real servers with default routes back to the LVS router?
> The reason I ask is that NAT knows when the connection is finished as
> return packets come via it. So it may be the return packets are not
> getting to the LVS router.
>
> I use DR in which they don't so in this case Inactive connections is
> normal.
>
> I'm afraid I don't use NAT so beyond this I'm not much use.
>
> Doesn't the Redhat documentation tell you how to do this? If it only
> supports NAT it should tell you how to use it! Not much help I know.
> Sorry.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bunpot
> Thanaboonsombut
> Sent: 02 November 2005 16:04
> To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
> Subject: Re: LVS-NAT and Squid Real Server
>
> On 11/2/05, Purcocks, Graham <grahamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Strange. Good job I didn't buy it then :) I need DR on RedHat.
> >
> > Throw it all away and use Ultramonkey 3. ;)
> >
>
> Really bad news for me. My company policy force me to use RHCS. Anyone
> can clarify me about this question?
>
> Can LVS forward the request by itself or need iptables to help this
> function?
> I try to connect the proxy but not work.
>
> ipvsadm show inactive connection instead of active one???
>
> IP Virtual Server version 1.2.0 (size=4096)
> Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
> -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
> TCP 172.30.33.89:squid dh persistent 60
> -> 172.30.48.100:squid Masq 1 0 1
>
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bunpot
> > Thanaboonsombut
> > Sent: 02 November 2005 15:26
> > To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
> > Subject: Re: LVS-NAT and Squid Real Server
> >
> > On 11/2/05, Purcocks, Graham <grahamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > I thought the Cluster Suite was just a Redhat wrapper of LVS so all
> > > methods should be available. So does Cluster Suite really = LVS-NAT?
> > > What if you want Tun?
> > >
> > As refer to Red Hat documentation, LVS-NAT is only one topology
> > supported by RHCS. LVS-TUN and LVS-DR are not supported. :(
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
|
