|
I'm sorry you've exhausted my knowledge of NAT. Hopefully, someone else
can help.
-----Original Message-----
From: lvs-users-bounces+grahamp=wsieurope.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:lvs-users-bounces+grahamp=wsieurope.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Bunpot Thanaboonsombut
Sent: 02 November 2005 16:21
To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
Subject: Re: LVS-NAT and Squid Real Server
Dear Graham,
Thank you very much for your help.
The real server is already using LVS as a gateway. I read all Red Hat
documentation throughly but it does not mention about howto build the
proxy cluster with LVS. I just need the example to follow.
As my investigation, current LVS is not fowarding the packet from
Virtual IP to the real server. I will very gratefully if you can tell
me the way to resolve this problem.
Bunpot T.
On 11/2/05, Purcocks, Graham <grahamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You do have the real servers with default routes back to the LVS
router?
> The reason I ask is that NAT knows when the connection is finished as
> return packets come via it. So it may be the return packets are not
> getting to the LVS router.
>
> I use DR in which they don't so in this case Inactive connections is
> normal.
>
> I'm afraid I don't use NAT so beyond this I'm not much use.
>
> Doesn't the Redhat documentation tell you how to do this? If it only
> supports NAT it should tell you how to use it! Not much help I know.
> Sorry.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bunpot
> Thanaboonsombut
> Sent: 02 November 2005 16:04
> To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
> Subject: Re: LVS-NAT and Squid Real Server
>
> On 11/2/05, Purcocks, Graham <grahamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Strange. Good job I didn't buy it then :) I need DR on RedHat.
> >
> > Throw it all away and use Ultramonkey 3. ;)
> >
>
> Really bad news for me. My company policy force me to use RHCS. Anyone
> can clarify me about this question?
>
> Can LVS forward the request by itself or need iptables to help this
> function?
> I try to connect the proxy but not work.
>
> ipvsadm show inactive connection instead of active one???
>
> IP Virtual Server version 1.2.0 (size=4096)
> Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
> -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
> TCP 172.30.33.89:squid dh persistent 60
> -> 172.30.48.100:squid Masq 1 0 1
>
>
>
|
