Re: ip_vs_bind_dest inactconns counter difference between 2.4.x and 2.6.x

[Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>]

        Hello,

On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Roberto Nibali wrote:

> I really think this should be changed in 2.4.x as well. I'll ship my
> kernel with these changes. This also allows us to easier maintain the
> not-so-big gap between IPVS-2.4 and IPVS-2.6. Please don't abandon IPVS-2.4.

        May be you know, only bug fixes to 2.4. I don't know
if Marcelo will agree for such changes, may be they were forgotten
long time ago when IPVS was included into 2.4. Now it is too late.
As for me, i agree with you, ip_vs_bind_dest() is the right place
to touch inactconns, that is why Wensong changed it in this way but
i don't have enough time to play with IPVS.

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>