lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: cluster vs. lvs |
From: | "Graham David Purcocks M.A.(Oxon.)" <grahamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:35:33 +0000 |
LVS is completed separate from your cluster. Think of it as a router. It directs traffic to your cluster whether it be master or slave so is essentially outside of it. You *can* use real servers as directors but it gets real messy so its much better to keep it simple. Graham On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 16:10, jess patel wrote: > > > This might be the stupidest question on earth but I was only curious.... > > > > > > Lets say there is a cluster with master node and others are just slave > nodes....if you are setting up lvs with director and real servers....is > master node the place where the director is set up and the nodes are where > the real servers are set up????? > > > > or I am getting it wrong? > > > > --p > > > --------------------------------- > Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click. > _______________________________________________ > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | cluster vs. lvs, jess patel |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: cluster vs. lvs, jess patel |
Previous by Thread: | cluster vs. lvs, jess patel |
Next by Thread: | Re: cluster vs. lvs, jess patel |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |