|
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Rob Ruth wrote:
lvs public ip - 172.16.123.24 (dmz)
lvs private ip - 10.0.0.252 (lan)
virtual ip - 172.16.123.25 (dmz)
real server - 10.0.0.95 (lan)
public (routable) ip - 198.x.x.x (wan)
I have two layers of nat. Firewall to lvs (wan -> dmz) and lvs to real server
(dmz -> lan). The public IP is nat'd to the vip on my firewall.
Without ip_vs_ftp the passive mode message is displaying the publicly
routable address (198.x.x.x). When I load ip_vs_ftp the message shows the vip
which is on a private dmz (172.16.123.25).
Figuring out what you've got it more that you can expect us
to deal with. How about you use our lingo? The address you
connect to on the director is the VIP. The address on the
outside of the firewall is the address on the outside of the
firewall and should not be a part of this.
Is the problem on the director or the firewall and what is
the problem?
Joe
--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
| 