On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Rob Ruth wrote:
lvs public ip - 172.16.123.24 (dmz)
lvs private ip - 10.0.0.252 (lan)
virtual ip - 172.16.123.25 (dmz)
real server - 10.0.0.95 (lan)
public (routable) ip - 198.x.x.x (wan)
I have two layers of nat. Firewall to lvs (wan -> dmz) and lvs to
real server (dmz -> lan). The public IP is nat'd to the vip on my
firewall.
Without ip_vs_ftp the passive mode message is displaying the publicly
routable address (198.x.x.x). When I load ip_vs_ftp the message shows
the vip which is on a private dmz (172.16.123.25).
Figuring out what you've got it more that you can expect us to deal
with. How about you use our lingo? The address you connect to on the
director is the VIP. The address on the outside of the firewall is the
address on the outside of the firewall and should not be a part of this.
Is the problem on the director or the firewall and what is the problem?
Joe
--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml Homepage
http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users