|
Really just to see how it compares. Does Sparc offer any advantages
over Intel/AMD with regard to latency (LVS-NAT)? Would it handle SSL
connections better, worse, or no different? Could it handle more real
servers than an x86 counterpart?
On 2/20/06, Roberto Nibali <ratz@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Does anyone know any performance data for LVS on a Sparc 64 processor?
>
> Not that I know of. What numbers would you be interested in
> specifically? The processor never is an issue regarding LVS unless your
> NIC is so badly designed that the CPU would need to take over the packet
> processing ;).
>
> Regards,
> Roberto Nibali, ratz
> --
> echo
> '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq' | dc
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
|
