|
I can't speak to the specific drawbacks of either method, but we have been
running a shared hosting system with many static ips for SSL via NAT for a
couple years now with no real notable problems.
Good Luck!
-----Original Message-----
From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vasiliy
Boulytchev
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 2:13 PM
To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
Subject: Hosting with LVS-DR or NAT?
Gents,
I am facing a dilema right now. Need to position and design the
cluster for future growth/needs.
If i have several web sites, which require static ips for ssl... are
there any drawbacks between running eith er lvs-dr or lvs-nat?
i am leaning towards the lvs-nat since i dont have to face the arp
problem
vasiliyb thanks for ALL you great remarks :)
THANKS!
--
Vasiliy Boulytchev
Colorado Information Technologies
www.coinfotech.com
|
