RE: Hosting with LVS-DR or NAT?

To: "' users mailing list.'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Hosting with LVS-DR or NAT?
From: "William Olson" <ntadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:34:46 -0800
I can't speak to the specific drawbacks of either method, but we have been
running a shared hosting system with many static ips for SSL via NAT for a
couple years now with no real notable problems.

Good Luck!

-----Original Message-----
From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vasiliy
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 2:13 PM
To: users mailing list.
Subject: Hosting with LVS-DR or NAT?


    I am facing a dilema right now.  Need to position and design the 
cluster for future growth/needs.
    If i have several web sites, which require static ips for ssl... are 
there any drawbacks between running eith er lvs-dr or lvs-nat?

    i am leaning towards the lvs-nat since i dont have to face the arp 

    vasiliyb thanks for ALL you great remarks :)


Vasiliy Boulytchev
Colorado Information Technologies

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>