William, thank you for your insight! Quick question, how do you
guys administer your DR, when you need to add another client? Do you
guys map a static internal address to a static address on the DR?
Just trying to understand how to write my scripts :)
William Olson wrote:
I can't speak to the specific drawbacks of either method, but we have been
running a shared hosting system with many static ips for SSL via NAT for a
couple years now with no real notable problems.
[mailto:lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vasiliy
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 2:13 PM
To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
Subject: Hosting with LVS-DR or NAT?
I am facing a dilema right now. Need to position and design the
cluster for future growth/needs.
If i have several web sites, which require static ips for ssl... are
there any drawbacks between running eith er lvs-dr or lvs-nat?
i am leaning towards the lvs-nat since i dont have to face the arp
vasiliyb thanks for ALL you great remarks :)
Colorado Information Technologies