lvs-users
|
To: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
Subject: | fail-over as opposed to round-robin |
From: | <ahall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 17 May 2006 16:34:00 +0100 |
Hi there, Can the LVS provide a fail-over type of redundancy, as well as a round-robin type? That is, if I have two servers in my virtual "pool" can I direct all traffic to just one server until it fails, and then all traffic will be directed to the other server? This is the configuration I would like, for I don't wish to round-robin requests across both servers in the pool. Is this possible? Thanks very much. ---- - Madasafish - Voted Best Heavy Consumer Broadband Provider in the 2006 Internet Industry Awards http://www.madasafish.com/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: hosts detailed in hosts file not resolved, Graeme Fowler |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: fail-over as opposed to round-robin, Joseph Mack NA3T |
Previous by Thread: | hosts detailed in hosts file not resolved, Rafael Vallejo |
Next by Thread: | Re: fail-over as opposed to round-robin, Joseph Mack NA3T |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |