LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

fail-over as opposed to round-robin

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: fail-over as opposed to round-robin
From: <ahall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 16:34:00 +0100
Hi there,

Can the LVS provide a fail-over type of redundancy, as well as a round-robin 
type?

That is, if I have two servers in my virtual "pool" can I direct all traffic to
just one server until it fails, and then all traffic will be directed to the
other server?

This is the configuration I would like, for I don't wish to round-robin requests
across both servers in the pool.

Is this possible?

Thanks very much.




---- - Madasafish - Voted Best Heavy Consumer Broadband Provider in the 2006 
Internet Industry Awards http://www.madasafish.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>