lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: CARP or VRRP ? |
From: | "Kristoffer Egefelt" <dr.fersken@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 7 Jul 2006 09:53:03 +0200 |
Thanks guys for the quick response :) For Mr. Egefelt, I think its best to have separate redundant firewalls using CARP, and then a load balancer behind that. Two firewalls and one loadbalancer? It was actually the loadbalancer I wanted to fail over ;) Currently the loadbalancers are also firewalls, so I'm just looking to failover the loadbalancers, and I assume the firewall will follow. Is there a problem using CARP for failover of ipvs? Thanks /Kristoffer |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | firewall sandwich load balancing (fwd), David Lang |
---|---|
Next by Date: | v1.132 ldirectord HTTPS negotiate doesn't seem to work?, malcolm |
Previous by Thread: | Re: CARP or VRRP ?, Clint Byrum |
Next by Thread: | firewall sandwich load balancing (fwd), David Lang |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |