On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Bill Omer wrote:
> I'm wondering how much it would tax the director.
completely wild-assed guess:
when the LVS-NAT director was using the masquerading code
(2.0.x and 2.2.x kernels) a 75MHz director could do 50Mbps
of LVS-NAT (ie about half saturating 100Mbps ethernet) -
admittedly the director had a high load average (see my
performance page). Scaling this up to modern hardware
(1.5GHz director) using the old kernels, should give you
1Gbps of LVS-NAT at high load average. Now changing to the
netfilter code (2.4.x and 2.6.x kernels), you should be able
to get 1Gbps of LVS-NAT with a low load average. Is that
enough?
Joe
--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
|