![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Most stable kernel for LVS? |
| From: | "Brett Elliott" <brettelliott@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:32:35 -0400 |
It has been a few years since I have used LVS + keepalived but I was wondering what people who have been using LVS in production think the most stable kernel version is for LVS? I want to do direct route+wlc with a LVS backup(with keepalived if that matters). I can potentially use any kernel, vanilla to suse/ redhat / CentOS kernels, whatever it takes. Thanks, Brett |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Problem with two boxes LVS, Joseph Mack NA3T |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 2.6 kernel on debian director, Jason Downing |
| Previous by Thread: | Problem with two boxes LVS, Dirk Umlauffd |
| Next by Thread: | 2.6 kernel on debian director, Jason Downing |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |