> Ok... it seems like there's a huge flaw in my understanding of how
> traffic gets back to where it came from. For some reason, I had always
> thought that the routing table was meant for new outgoing connections
> which is stupid because I've run into multiple problems where I
> couldn't
> contact a remote host because the remote host's routing table was
> wrong.
>
> So yeah... LVS-DR makes PERFECT sense now.
Good to hear. :)
> Now, if only someone could explain how you can use active-active to
> increase throughput beyond a single LVS.... my mind can finally rest :)
Unfortunately, that I can't help you with, I'm an LVS-newb myself, but I had
a good grasp of the other bits. :D
Dave
|