|
Hi Francisco,
I have a similar setup currently. I'm pushing about 3,000 connections,
205mbit, 0.01 load and barely any CPU usage. I'm looking at a possible
project where I would need to support at least 10gbit/sec of bandwidth
so i'm trying to figure how how the heck I can accomplish that. I've
already accepted that i'll need several pairs of LVS servers using
bonded gig-e, but it would be nice if i could also use active-active to
increase my bandwidth capability.
---
Michael Spiegle
mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Francisco Gimeno wrote:
> Hi
>
>> Now, if only someone could explain how you can use active-active to
>> increase throughput beyond a single LVS.... my mind can finally rest :)
>>
> last time I played with that I used the saru alpha project.
> It wasn't as stable as desired, but I don't if somebody has worked on it.
>
> anyway, LVS has a good throughput in a modest box. I haven't made the tests
> by
> myself, but I can tell you that balancing around 250MBit of WebCache (squid)
> traffic ( well, just the requests ), just consumes around a 5% or less in a
> normal server (HP Proliant DL380).
>
> BR,
> Francisco Gimeno
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
>
>
|
