LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Antw: LVS-NAT

To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Antw: LVS-NAT
From: "Stephan Hendl" <Stephan.Hendl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:33:26 +0100
Hi,

I tried a similiar configuration and got loss of performance once I enabled 
statefull inspection. ipvs and statefull are two things which one shouldn't use 
together!

Stephan

>>> Gustavo Mateus <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb am 26.02.2007 um 14:07 in
Nachricht <45E2DB78.5040604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hello,
> 
> Probably this issue was already discussed here but I did not find the 
> messages related.
> 
> I'm creating a Active-Active structure to host several virtual servers 
> with 2 directors. About 40 to 50 real servers will be connected to this 
> 2 directors.
> The idea is to use those guys as firewalls too, statefull, for common 
> services (80, 443, 21, 25).
> Because of that we need to use LVS-NAT for our load balancing solution.
> 
> My questions are:
> - LVS-NAT can handle 50 servers?
> - Is it ok to use the director as a firewall too?
> 
> The directors are very good servers - Dell pe1950 Intel Xeon  5110 Dual 
> Core de 1.60 Ghz with 2 GB of ram ( we still have the possibility to put 
> one more processor on each director)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gustavo
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>