Re: Antw: LVS-NAT

[Gustavo Mateus <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

And about LVS-NAT?
Is it still the least scalable? How many RS is the limit?

Stephan Hendl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried a similiar configuration and got loss of performance once I enabled 
> statefull inspection. ipvs and statefull are two things which one shouldn't use 
> together!
>
> Stephan
>
>   
> > > > Gustavo Mateus <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb am 26.02.2007 um 14:07 in
> > > >         
> Nachricht <45E2DB78.5040604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>   
> > Hello,
> >
> > Probably this issue was already discussed here but I did not find the 
> > messages related.
> > I'm creating a Active-Active structure to host several virtual servers 
> > with 2 directors. About 40 to 50 real servers will be connected to this 
> > 2 directors.
> > The idea is to use those guys as firewalls too, statefull, for common 
> > services (80, 443, 21, 25).
> > Because of that we need to use LVS-NAT for our load balancing solution.
> >
> > My questions are:
> > - LVS-NAT can handle 50 servers?
> > - Is it ok to use the director as a firewall too?
> >
> > The directors are very good servers - Dell pe1950 Intel Xeon  5110 Dual 
> > Core de 1.60 Ghz with 2 GB of ram ( we still have the possibility to put 
> > one more processor on each director)
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Gustavo
> > _______________________________________________
> > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> >     
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
>
>