Re: Page cannot be displayed

[Mark Maiden <mark.maiden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you for your response. I agree about the information, we're 
finding it hard to get firm networking info from our customers. As 
regards errors, can you give me a little indication as to how to get 
detailed information on this? Here's my ifconfig which shows no errors 
on the interface on the UM box :
eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:15:C5:E1:10:8B
          inet addr:xxx.xxx.xxx.251  Bcast:xxx.xxx.xxx.255              
          Mask:255.255.255.240
          inet6 addr: fe80::215:c5ff:fee1:108b/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:5050416 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:5207932 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:2794012482 (2.6 GiB)  TX bytes:2807683093 (2.6 GiB)
          Interrupt:169

Mark Maiden
Systems Administrator
Globoforce, Ltd
 6 Beckett Way Parkwest
 Dublin 12
 Ireland
 t: +353 1 625 8812
 f: +353 1 625 8880
 e: markm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  www.globoforce.com

  http://guidance.gospelcom.net/answer.htm


Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Mark Maiden wrote:
>
> > 1: I assume that because we are using masq(NAT) that we don't need to
> > worry about the noarp problem with DR or TUN?
> correct
>
> > 2: Is there any ip tuning that we should do on the Ultra Monkey box as
> > not only is it acting as the load balancer but it is also a router
> > too?
> nope. Just use standard kernel settings.
>
> > 3: Has anybody else seen this intermittent "Page cannot be displayed"
> > error with UM?
> Intermittent problems are hard to diagnose. You're going to have to find 
> out what is really going on. "Page cannot be displayed" is not helpful. 
> Are you getting icmp errors, tcp errors, are they coming from the 
> director, the realserver?
> Joe