LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: LVS Tunneling

To: "'LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: LVS Tunneling
From: "Upblogger.com" <contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 20:29:29 +0200
-----Original Message-----
From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joseph Mack
NA3T
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 7:55 PM
To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
Subject: RE: LVS Tunneling

On Thu, 17 May 2007, Upblogger.com wrote:

>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> My provider does not authorize private networks

> yes, but can you have two more IPs on the RIP network (the 
> CIP, VIP)?

Each server can have another IP (87.98.225.xxx), having the same IP range
the VIP has. Should I configure all servers to have the 87.98.225.XXX range?
Would that do the trick?

>> so I'm stuck with the public
>> IPs. This behavior is weird. On my office LAN I have it up and running
with
>> keepalived. Lan and outside clients can connect to the VIP. I'll re-read
the
>> mini-HOWTO to see I've missed something.

> is apache on the realserver listening on the VIP (it should 
> be)?

Apache is configured to listen on VIP:80 (Listen 87.98.225.39:80)

Thanks again,

Antoni



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>