LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] Is it worth reading on?

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Is it worth reading on?
From: Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Kyrios wrote:

> Hi all,

Bill has already addressed most of your issues, but I'll at 
least confirm what he's said.

> I'm searching a solution to cluster Gameservers. The solution should make
> Gameservers (which are unique through the used TCP/UDP Port)

unique for listening port?

If so, you can use LVS. For LVS all realservers must be 
identical.

> transparent to
> end users. Let's say I got 6 Realservers and I notice that Realserver #1 is
> under heavy load while Realserver #3 is nearly idle. Then I will stop the
> instance on #1 and launch it on #3.

not on LVS. The director assumes that the realserver is up 
or that it's crashed. You can't move connections.

Mosix will move processes (and connections)

Joe
-- 
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>