LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] Is it worth reading on?

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Is it worth reading on?
From: Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:

> On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Kyrios wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>
> Bill has already addressed most of your issues, but I'll at
> least confirm what he's said.
>
>> I'm searching a solution to cluster Gameservers. The solution should make
>> Gameservers (which are unique through the used TCP/UDP Port)
>
> unique for listening port?
>
> If so, you can use LVS. For LVS all realservers must be

sorry s/can/cannot/

Joe


> identical.
>
>> transparent to
>> end users. Let's say I got 6 Realservers and I notice that Realserver #1 is
>> under heavy load while Realserver #3 is nearly idle. Then I will stop the
>> instance on #1 and launch it on #3.
>
> not on LVS. The director assumes that the realserver is up
> or that it's crashed. You can't move connections.
>
> Mosix will move processes (and connections)
>
> Joe
>

-- 
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>