Re: [lvs-users] Problem trying to get an (old) ultra-monkey example to work (LVS-DR)

[Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, Jonas Akrouh Larsen wrote:

> TCP  192.168.100.35:80 rr
>
>  -> 192.168.100.32:80            Local   1      0          0
>
>  -> 192.168.100.31:80            Route   1      0          0
>
>
>
> As you can see the realserver 192.168.100.32:80 is listed 
> as Local. Which DO make sence since that realserver is 
> local to the director im issuing the command on.

do you have 4 boxes or 2?

> Now here comes the problem: If I try to connect to the 
> service, it works 50% of the time. If it hits the Local 
> realserver everything works, but the other 50% of the 
> attemps it tries the other real server, and that just 
> fails.

is the route set correctly for the 2nd realserver?

Can you not send alternate blank lines?

Joe


-- 
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!