[lvs-users] direct-direct routing

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [lvs-users] direct-direct routing
From: Jan-Frode Myklebust <janfrode@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:17:54 +0200
I see the direct routing docs describe direct routing as a asyncrouns
connection where packets are coming in trough the LVS and responses from
the real-servers are routed independently of LVS.

So what's the problem with having the LVS be the default gw of the
real-servers? Is it just to avoid being a bandwidth bottleneck, or are
there other issues ?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>