![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [lvs-users] direct-direct routing |
| From: | Jan-Frode Myklebust <janfrode@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:17:54 +0200 |
I see the direct routing docs describe direct routing as a asyncrouns connection where packets are coming in trough the LVS and responses from the real-servers are routed independently of LVS. So what's the problem with having the LVS be the default gw of the real-servers? Is it just to avoid being a bandwidth bottleneck, or are there other issues ? -jf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] about weight, Graeme Fowler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] direct-direct routing, Graeme Fowler |
| Previous by Thread: | [lvs-users] about weight, Marius STOIAN |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] direct-direct routing, Graeme Fowler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |