On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, David Hinkle wrote:
> Oh, just a quick suggestion. This hack would be
> completely unnecessary if you could simply configure a
> backup LVS server not to try and load balance.
do you know that in the current way of doing director
failover that the backup director is getting the ipvsadm
state table from the active director, so that it when the
backup becomes the active, that it knows the state of the
lvs controlled connections?
If you know that already, what's missing from LVS that you
need?
> I just want a backup to sit there and collect data, I
> don't want it to try and load balance anything until I
> promote it! :)
It doesn't loadbalance till you send it packets.
It seems that you and I have a different idea about what's
happening here and I don't know what you idea is. Can you
straighten me out?
Thanks
Joe
--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
|