|
> oops. you're using LVS-NAT. There is no VIP on the realserver,
> only the RIP. What other IP is there to test?
I said I was using LVS-nat because all of my ldirectord.cf entries
include the "masq" directive. I may be mangling my terms. Just because
I've been sucessfully using LVS/ldirectord for a year on a national
scale doesn't mean I know how to talk about it. :-)
My load-balancer computer has about 60 entries like this:
# Virtual Server for tomcat(site001), Outside to Inside
virtual=192.168.5.100:3001
real=192.168.10.61:3001 masq
real=192.168.10.62:3001 masq
service=http
request="/checkup.html"
receive="site001_tomcat_is_up"
scheduler=lblc
protocol=tcp
checktype=3
persistent=360
My question really was this: is there a fixed limit to the number of
these entries that LVS/ldirectord will support, or is it just limited by
system resources? I assume it is the latter. If so, then do you think I
am likely to see performance bottlenecks at some point soon? Right now
everything is fine, but I'm concerned about the ol'
straw-that-breaks-the-camel's-back syndrome.
--
Eric Robinson
Again, the annoying server-appended disclaimer...
Disclaimer - October 30, 2007
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.. If you are not the named
addressee you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any
views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and
might not represent those of Physician Select Management (PSM) or Physician's
Managed Care (PMC). Warning: Although the message sender has taken reasonable
precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, neither PSM nor PMC
can accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this
email or attachments.
|
