On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Ruben Laban wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> No ideas on the issue stated below as of yet?
apparently not (just so you don't think you're being
ignored, sometimes we don't have an answer).
> What could cause entries in the IPVS table to remain in
> the established (or any other) state even though there is
> no traffic flowing between the CIP/VIP/RIP?
neither end has closed the tcp connection?
> We're using persistency by the way. Though from what I've
> read, the given persistency timeout is only used once when
> a new connection arrives.
there are lots of problems with persistency, but it was the
first method we got to work for maintaining
client-realserver affinity. Another less intrusive method is
the -SH scheduler. You might find it causes less problems.
Joe
--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
|