|
Oh, ok, I'm sorry I misunderstood you. I thought you had a workaround for me.
I wonder, do you think the localnode code could be modified in such a manner as
to handle the work REDIRECT does by itself? If it could do that, then I could
get my "fully peered transparent cluster" thing working.
If you think it could be coded, maybe it's time for me to take a deep breath
and see if I can hack that kind of code together.
Perhaps it could work like this: If load balancing on a fwmark, and a port
number is specified when the localnode is defined, and the packets target port
does not equal the localnode defined port, then handle the transparent proxy
the same way that redirect does.
What do you think?
David
-----Original Message-----
From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Joseph Mack NA3T
Sent: Mon 12/10/2007 12:58 PM
To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Transparent proxy with Locanode
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, David Hinkle wrote:
> I want a transparent proxy cluster that supports utilizing
> the localnode.
I know that, and you know what happens if you try to do it.
> Currently I can get everything working without the
> localnode, I can only get the localnode working with
> REDIRECT, and REDIRECT breaks sending the packets out to
> other nodes... Is there a way to get the localnode to do
> transparent cache without REDIRECT?
people don't use localnode a whole lot and so no-one's
thought of expanding what you can do with it. I can't say
it's impossible, just that I don't know how.
Joe
--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
|
