lvs-users
|
To: | "LVS >> \"LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.\"" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | [lvs-users] active-active by a multipath routes |
From: | Siim Põder <windo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 09 May 2008 12:06:12 +0300 |
Hi! Is anyone running active-active(-active...) LVS setups? Is it saru or something else? It's seems it should be possible to do it without saru by having multipath route-capable router upstream dividing the traffic between all the directors. If you can manage the routes with OSPF, it should be possible to have active-active directors using more common protocols and software with the added benefit of each director only receiving the packets it ends up handling. Any thoughts, comments, experiences with anything like this? Siim |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] Weird problem after realserver crashes, Graeme Fowler |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] active-active by a multipath routes, Joseph Mack NA3T |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] Weird problem after realserver crashes, Janar Kartau |
Next by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] active-active by a multipath routes, Joseph Mack NA3T |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |