LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] active-active by a multipath routes

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] active-active by a multipath routes
From: Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 05:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 9 May 2008, Siim Põder wrote:

Hi!

Is anyone running active-active(-active...) LVS setups? Is it saru or something else?

saru was a proof of principle piece of code by Horms a few years ago. It was done for one kernel and has not been maintained through the subsequent kernels.

It's seems it should be possible to do it without saru by having multipath route-capable router upstream dividing the traffic between all the directors. If you can manage the routes with OSPF, it should be possible to have active-active directors using more common protocols and software with the added benefit of each director only receiving the packets it ends up handling.

Any thoughts, comments, experiences with anything like this?

few of us have access to routers to try such experiments. So it's possible this would work, but few people would be able to implement it.

I've been to talks where people manually redirected traffic from busy servers to less busy servers on the other side of the continent in this way, as load changed during the day, so presumably some people are doing this all the time already.

How would you tell the routers to divide the traffic?

Joe

--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>