|
If we get this working, there will be redundancy.
Just need to get through this milestone first.
Thanks
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 04:33 -0400, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2008-09-12T17:27:31, Josh.Mullis@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the response.
> >
> > I actually just want the dom0 (virtual core/host os) to run LVS, not
> a vm.
> > The vm's running on the core are the "realservers" only running
> BIND.
> >
> > These are all on the same physical hardware.
>
> Is there a point to doing that? You get neither redundancy nor more
> scalability compared to running them either natively (w/o a
> hypervisor,
> which would in fact provide more system resources), or as one big VM,
> do
> you?
>
>
> Regards,
> Lars
>
> --
> Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
> "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar
> Wilde
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
