Alex,
The short answer is no.
It depends on your application.
Run them all on the same weight for a while and see how they get
loaded, then decide if you need to play with the weights or just add
more servers.
In a layer 4 balanced cluster I normally recommend no greater than 40%
utilisation as a rule of thumb to cope with peaks in demand.
2008/11/13 Alex <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> [snip from lvs docs]
> During configuration, you assign a weight to each real server. This is an
> integer reflecting each server's processing capacity relative to that of the
> others. It is the ratio (2/1, 20/10, 200/100) that is significant. For
> example, a weight of 2000 assigned to a server indicates that it has twice
> the computing power of a server assigned a weight of 1000.You should be
> prepared to assign accurate weights
> [end snip]
>
> So WEIGHT is an integer reflecting each server's processing capacity based on:
> - memory,
> - processor speed,
> - number of processors
>
> Now, we have 3 real servers, all having only one processor, as follow:
>
> Server1:
> CELERON_1GHz_384MB
> Server2:
> P3_1GHz_512MB
> Server3:
> CELERON_850MHz_128MB
>
> Can somebody tell me how to estimate weight for each?
>
> Regards,
> Alx
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
|