|
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 3:22 AM, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
<ildefonso.camargo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:18 PM, luca boncompagni <lbonco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I need to map different ports on the real server:
> >
> > VIP:80
> > R1:9080
> > R1:9081
> > R1:9082
> > R2:9080
> > R2:9081
> > R2:9082
>
> Ok. Np.
>
> >
> > Do you suggest to do something like:
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________
> > | | | |
> > C=10.3.136.23 VS=10.3.136.24 R1=192.168.10.1 R2=192.168.10.2
> > _____________ _____________ _____________ _____________
> > | | | | | | | |
> > | client | | director | | realserver1 | | realserver2 |
> > |_____________| |_____________| |_____________| |_____________|
> >
> >
>
> mmmm..... Yes.
>
> > By the way, is there any way to do SNAT with LVS?
>
> dunno, I have always used iptables for that purpose.
My problem is that I can't assign a range of ip
(10.3.136.20-10.3.136.30) to the real server, but I have 10.3.136.21
and 10.3.136.25. I know that iptables can do this only with kernel
2.6.10, but this is too old.
Thanks,
Luca
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Luca
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
> > <ildefonso.camargo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> 1. Any particular reason why you need to use NAT for load-balancing on
> >> the same network segment? why not try DR instead?
> >> 2. If you really need NAT, you could create a "servers network" (it
> >> doesn't matter if they are on the same network segment, you just need
> >> them to be on different networks, ej. 192.168.1.0/24).
> >>
> >> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 2:16 PM, luca boncompagni <lbonco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I need to balance a cluster of servers inside the same subnet as below:
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________________________
> >>> | | | |
> >>> C=10.3.136.23 VS=10.3.136.24 R1=10.3.136.25 R2=10.3.136.26
> >>> _____________ _____________ _____________ _____________
> >>> | | | | | | | |
> >>> | client | | director | | realserver1 | | realserver2 |
> >>> |_____________| |_____________| |_____________| |_____________|
> >>>
> >>> The director is a debian/testing with
> >>> - kernel 2.6.26-1-686
> >>> - ipvsadm v1.24 2005/12/10 (compiled with popt and IPVS v1.2.0)
> >>>
> >>> I use:
> >>>
> >>> ipvsadm -A -t 10.3.136.24:80 -s rr
> >>> ipvsadm -a -t 10.3.136.24:80 -r 10.3.136.25:80 -m
> >>> ipvsadm -a -t 10.3.136.24:80 -r 10.3.136.26:80 -m
> >>>
> >>> and i try with:
> >>>
> >>> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j SNAT --to 10.3.136.24
> >>>
> >>> but SNAT is not working.
> >>>
> >>> How can I do?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Luca
> >>>
>
|
