|
Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Arndt Roth wrote:
>
>> My questions is, if it is possible to bind each VS in ldirector to a
>> particular core and to a particular NIC for optimal perfomance?
>
> is ldirector lvs or ldirectord? Make sure you understand the
> difference.
>
> The short answer is no. The real question is why do you
> think this would give optimal performance? It might but you
> haven't explained why
Au contraire. numactl can bind a process to a specific CPU and shared
memory space. I don't believe it can be used to bind a process to a
specific NIC if you're using channel bonding, but feel free to read the
numactl man pages.
That said, from what I understand, ldirectord shouldn't *need* to be
optimized (but I don't use it so ymmv).
Cheers,
Dan
--
Dan Yocum
Fermilab 630.840.6509
yocum@xxxxxxxx, http://fermigrid.fnal.gov
Fermilab. Just zeros and ones.
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
