|
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Arndt Roth wrote:
> Thanks for all your replies.
> I just wanted to avoid a setup, where one core would get the full load
> (the others idling) while trying to handle all network throuput.
(someone correct me if I'm wrong..., I don't really know too
much about this)
There'll ony be one instance of the kernel/ip_vs() running.
Whether it's parked on one cpu or moves around is the
business of the kernel not you.
> So, there is no easy way (and it doesn't make any sense) to tell the
> kernel to handle each NICs traffic with a particular core.
I didn't realise you could have affinity with a NIC till
Horms pointed it out. I thought the packets were sent to the
routing table, which choose the NIC. I didn't think ip_vs
could have any affect on which NIC would be handling the
packets.
Joe
--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
