|
http://lists.graemef.net/pipermail/lvs-users/2008-July/021071.html
The thread linked above describes exactly the behaviour I've seen and
strugged with when trying to configure LVS. In the past I've inherited
badly configured systems where the fallback behaviour only worked by
accident, because the sysadmins who created them didn't realise that
they had apache listening on all ip addresses and not just 127.0.0.1
In my opinion, this behaviour is broken. If it's not going to be fixed,
can the documentation at least be updated to match the actual behaviour?
The thread implies that LVS did once behave as documented but that this
changed, possibly unintentionally as a side-effect of some other
feature. Is there a reason why it can't change back? I *want* to be
able to run fallback services on the director because it minimises
dependencies; I want to be able to run them only on localhost because
that is more secure and on configurable ports for flexibility.
--
Bruce
What would Edward Woodward do?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
| 